Tuesday, December 10, 2019
Saturday, December 7, 2019
Sunday, November 3, 2019
Thursday, October 17, 2019
IMF suggests a $75 per ton carbon tax. What would it mean?
You will find more infographics at Statista
Sunday, September 15, 2019
Thursday, September 12, 2019
Friday, September 6, 2019
From Robert Hughes over at the American Institute for Economic Research.
U.S. nonfarm payrolls added 130,000 jobs in August, below the consensus expectation of 158,000. The prior two months were revised down, showing gains of 159,000 and 178,000 for July and June, respectively. The three-month average from June to August was 156,000, well below the 199,000 average since 2011, but still a decent performance. Despite the slowdown in jobs growth, hourly earnings rose, the length of the workweek increased, the unemployment rate held steady and the participation rate rose. Overall, the report provides mixed signals.
Tuesday, September 3, 2019
Thursday, July 18, 2019
Highly Recommended: "Commanding Nature by Obeying Her; A Review Essay on Joel Mokyr's Culture of Growth"
From NBER Working Paper 26061: Enrico Spolaore: Commanding Nature by Obeying Her; A Review Essay on Joel Mokyr's Culture of Growth
Abstract:
Abstract:
Why is modern society capable of cumulative innovation? In A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy, Joel Mokyr persuasively argues that sustained technological progress stemmed from a change in cultural beliefs. The change occurred gradually during the seventeenth and eighteenth century and was fostered by an intellectual elite that formed a transnational community and adopted new attitudes toward the creation and diffusion of knowledge, setting the foundation for the ethos of modern science. The book is a significant contribution to the growing literature that links culture and economics. This review discusses Mokyr’s historical analysis in relation to the following questions: What is culture and how should we use it in economics? How can culture explain modern economic growth? Will the culture of growth that caused modern prosperity persist in the future?This essay is highly recommended. Link here.
Monday, July 8, 2019
New NBER Working Paper: Improving the accuracy of economic measurement with multiple data sources: The case of payroll employment data
A new NBER Working Paper, "Improving the accuracy of economic measurement with multiple data sources: The case of payroll employment data," by Cajner, Crane, Decker, Hamins-Puertolas, and Kurz.
Abstract:
Abstract:
This paper combines information from two sources of U.S. private payroll employment to increase the accuracy of real-time measurement of the labor market. The sources are the Current Employment Statistics (CES) from BLS and microdata from the payroll processing firm ADP. We briefly describe the ADP-derived data series, compare it to the BLS data, and describe an exercise that benchmarks the data series to an employment census. The CES and the ADP employment data are each derived from roughly equal-sized samples. We argue that combining CES and ADP data series reduces the measurement error inherent in both data sources. In particular, we infer “true” unobserved payroll employment growth using a state-space model and find that the optimal predictor of the unobserved state puts approximately equal weight on theCES and ADP-derived series. Moreover, the estimated state contains information about future readings of payroll employment.Available at NBER.
Friday, July 5, 2019
Notes on the U.S. Employment Situation for June 2019: U-rate 3.7%, Jobs +224,000
OVERVIEW
ANALYSIS
After a weak May payrolls report (+72,000) the U.S. jobs machine roared back with 224,000 new jobs in June.
Professional and Business Services, Health Care and Transportation and Warehousing sectors lead June’s growth.
Overall, the jobs machine is clearly slowing down. Employment growth, according to the BLS, has averaged 172,000 this calendar year compared with an average of 223,000 in 2018.
However, today’s BLS report shattered expectations; Wall Street expected a gain of 160,000 new jobs. While slower than one year ago, the private sector culled 191,000 new jobs. The parallel measure, the ADP National Employment Report, earlier this week projected a gain of 106,000 private jobs.
With the BLS revisions, the three-month average for U.S. job growth rang in at 171,000.
Despite uncertainty about international trade, the U.S. Manufacturing sector is holding its own. The Manufacturing sector added 17,000 jobs in June; while little changed over the past four months, manufacturing is growing albeit slowly. Thus far the sector has averaged 8,000 per month, compared with 22,000 last year.
The trade-tariff impasse is not diminishing growth in the sector. While the manufacturing sector employs approximately 120,000 less workers than it did before the Great Recession, average hourly wages are rising steadily. (See Figure A.)
Unemployment in the manufacturing sector declined from June 2018 to June 2019, from 3.1 percent to 2.8 percent. For most part, manufacturing attracts workers on the lower end of educational attainment, but wages are good entry point to the middle class. These workers have also fared well overall in the economy. Unemployment for those with less than a high school degree was 5.8 percent in May. Workers with a high school diploma and no college and some college faced unemployment rates of 3.9 percent and 3.0 percent, respectively.
- Total non-farm payroll employment increased by 224,000 and the unemployment rate rose to 3.7 percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- The Labor Force Participation (LFP) rate remained at 62.9 percent the same rate from one year ago. The Employment-Population ratio also remained at 60.6 percent.
- Professional and Business Services (+51,000) and Health Care (+35,000) led all sectors in May. Construction added 21,000 jobs. Manufacturing added 17,000 jobs.
- Employment in other industries did not change from May to June. Mining, Wholesale Trade, Retail Trade, Information, Financial Activities, Leisure and Hospitality and Government changed little.
- Average hourly earnings rose by 6 cents to $27.90. Since June 2018 wages are up 3.1 percent.
- In June, the average workweek for all employees remained at 34.4 hours.
- The number of persons employed part-time was unchanged in June (4.3 million). The number of long-termed unemployed (greater than 27 weeks) remained unchanged at 1.4 million and accounted for 23.7 percent of all unemployed.
- In June 1.6 million persons were not in the workforce but wanted and were available for work and sought employment in the last year. This group known as “workers marginally attached to the labor force” was unchanged since last year. BLS reports that 1.1 million of this group had not searched for work “for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities.”
- Revisions to the two previous months counted 11,000 less jobs than reported initially. April 2019 was revised from 224,000 to 216,000 while May 2019 was revised from 75,000 to 72,000.
ANALYSIS
After a weak May payrolls report (+72,000) the U.S. jobs machine roared back with 224,000 new jobs in June.
Professional and Business Services, Health Care and Transportation and Warehousing sectors lead June’s growth.
Overall, the jobs machine is clearly slowing down. Employment growth, according to the BLS, has averaged 172,000 this calendar year compared with an average of 223,000 in 2018.
However, today’s BLS report shattered expectations; Wall Street expected a gain of 160,000 new jobs. While slower than one year ago, the private sector culled 191,000 new jobs. The parallel measure, the ADP National Employment Report, earlier this week projected a gain of 106,000 private jobs.
With the BLS revisions, the three-month average for U.S. job growth rang in at 171,000.
Despite uncertainty about international trade, the U.S. Manufacturing sector is holding its own. The Manufacturing sector added 17,000 jobs in June; while little changed over the past four months, manufacturing is growing albeit slowly. Thus far the sector has averaged 8,000 per month, compared with 22,000 last year.
The trade-tariff impasse is not diminishing growth in the sector. While the manufacturing sector employs approximately 120,000 less workers than it did before the Great Recession, average hourly wages are rising steadily. (See Figure A.)
Unemployment in the manufacturing sector declined from June 2018 to June 2019, from 3.1 percent to 2.8 percent. For most part, manufacturing attracts workers on the lower end of educational attainment, but wages are good entry point to the middle class. These workers have also fared well overall in the economy. Unemployment for those with less than a high school degree was 5.8 percent in May. Workers with a high school diploma and no college and some college faced unemployment rates of 3.9 percent and 3.0 percent, respectively.
Figure A: Employment and Average Hourly Wages in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector |
Wednesday, July 3, 2019
Notes on the May 2019 Massachusetts Employment Situation: U-Rate: 3.0 %; Jobs: -3,600
OVERVIEW
ANALYSIS
Until last month, December 2016 was the last time the unemployment rate in Massachusetts ticked up by one-tenth of a point. In May 2019, the state’s rate ticked up to 3.0 percent. The state’s economy is still at full employment.
“Massachusetts continues to experience a strong economy with a low unemployment rate of 3.0 percent and over 60,000 more employed residents and 17,500 fewer unemployed residents in the last year. Also, the Commonwealth’s labor force participation rate remains at a near 15-year high and is 5 points above the US rate,” Labor and Workforce Development Secretary Rosalin Acosta said.
The state’s labor force totals 3.84 million representing a 67.8 percent labor force participation rate.
Manufacturing gained 100 jobs over the month, but the sector is still losing jobs since last year (1,800). Trade, Transportation and Utilities lost 2,300 jobs and Education and Health Services lost 300 jobs. However, Government added 400 jobs, part of the 4,200 jobs it gained year over year.
Since the end of the Great Recession in June 2009, the state’s unemployment rate has dropped significantly from 8.1 percent. During the recovery, the Massachusetts unemployment rate increased by no more than 0.1 percent six times. That means the rate has dropped or remained unchanged for 109 of the 120 months that mark the recession (see Chart A).
Massachusetts enjoys the 12th best unemployment rate in the U.S. (See Table A.) Two other New England states are atop the nation: Vermont has the lowest unemployment rate at 2.1 percent while New Hampshire registers third in the nation with its 2.4 percent rate.
The BLS updated the state’s county employment picture with April 2019 data. Middlesex and Hampshire counties enjoyed the lowest unemployment rates. More than half of the counties — 8 of 14— recorded rates lower than the statewide rate of 3.0 percent for April 2019 (See Table B).
- The state’s total unemployment rate for May increased to 3.0 percent according to the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development.
- From May 2018 to May 2019, the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that Massachusetts added 26,700 jobs.
- Professional, Scientific and Business Services added 1,000 jobs with 7,100 jobs added over the past 12 months.
- Education and Health Services lost 300 jobs over the month. Over the year, this sector gained 14,300 jobs
- Manufacturing gained 100 jobs in May and has lost 1,800 jobs over the year.
- The Construction sector lost 2,300 jobs and has lost 700 over the year.
- Trade, Transportation and Utilities lost 2,300 jobs over the month. Over the year, the sector lost 600 jobs.
- Financial Activities lost 100 while Information added 300 jobs in May.
- Growth in the Other Services sector remained unchanged but is up 2,300 over the year.
- Government added 400 jobs in May. Over the past 12 months this sector has gained 4,900 jobs.
- The 3.0 percent rate in Massachusetts is six-tenths of a point lower than the national rate of 3.6 percent.
- According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment rates were lower in 6 states, higher in 2 states, and stable in 42 states and the District of Columbia in May. Nonfarm payroll employment increased in Washington state and was essentially unchanged in 49 states and in D.C.
ANALYSIS
Until last month, December 2016 was the last time the unemployment rate in Massachusetts ticked up by one-tenth of a point. In May 2019, the state’s rate ticked up to 3.0 percent. The state’s economy is still at full employment.
“Massachusetts continues to experience a strong economy with a low unemployment rate of 3.0 percent and over 60,000 more employed residents and 17,500 fewer unemployed residents in the last year. Also, the Commonwealth’s labor force participation rate remains at a near 15-year high and is 5 points above the US rate,” Labor and Workforce Development Secretary Rosalin Acosta said.
The state’s labor force totals 3.84 million representing a 67.8 percent labor force participation rate.
Manufacturing gained 100 jobs over the month, but the sector is still losing jobs since last year (1,800). Trade, Transportation and Utilities lost 2,300 jobs and Education and Health Services lost 300 jobs. However, Government added 400 jobs, part of the 4,200 jobs it gained year over year.
Since the end of the Great Recession in June 2009, the state’s unemployment rate has dropped significantly from 8.1 percent. During the recovery, the Massachusetts unemployment rate increased by no more than 0.1 percent six times. That means the rate has dropped or remained unchanged for 109 of the 120 months that mark the recession (see Chart A).
Chart A.
Massachusetts enjoys the 12th best unemployment rate in the U.S. (See Table A.) Two other New England states are atop the nation: Vermont has the lowest unemployment rate at 2.1 percent while New Hampshire registers third in the nation with its 2.4 percent rate.
Table A: New England Unemployment Rates
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics |
The BLS updated the state’s county employment picture with April 2019 data. Middlesex and Hampshire counties enjoyed the lowest unemployment rates. More than half of the counties — 8 of 14— recorded rates lower than the statewide rate of 3.0 percent for April 2019 (See Table B).
Table B: County Unemployment Rates
Tuesday, July 2, 2019
Democrats Would Resolve the Question of Whether Illegal Immigrants Burden Society
Merrill Matthews: Democrats Would Resolve the Question of Whether Illegal Immigrants Burden Society
Like most economists, we think legal immigrants can be a huge benefit to the economy—because historically most immigrants, whether legal or otherwise, came here to work.
Like most economists, we think legal immigrants can be a huge benefit to the economy—because historically most immigrants, whether legal or otherwise, came here to work.
Saturday, June 29, 2019
Thursday, June 13, 2019
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Not Many See Full Employment in U.S. Economy: Conference Update
Central bankers are already making waves at what may well be the monetary-policy event of the year in the U.S.
Federal Reserve officials and leading academics are gathered in Chicago Tuesday and Wednesday to debate whether policy makers need to overhaul their strategies, tools and communication for managing inflation and preparing for the next economic downturn.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell kicked off the conference Tuesday with a few words on the global trade tensions that are rattling financial markets and leading investors to believe the Fed will cut rates soon.
Google claims: 100 percent renewable energy, for the second year in a row
From Google's blog 100 percent renewable energy, for the second year in a row
In 2017, we first reached our longstanding goal of buying enough renewable energy to match 100 percent of Google’s global annual electricity use. And we’re on a roll: during 2018, our purchases of energy from sources like solar and wind once again matched our entire annual electricity consumption.
We’re the first organization of our size to achieve 100 percent renewable energy two years running, but just as important as reaching our goal is how we did it. Addressing climate change will require adding renewable energy wherever possible and, for us as a company, making decisions that have an impact beyond our walls. We’ve asked ourselves: how can we use our purchasing to do the most good in the broader energy system?
Our first priority is to use as little energy as possible, operating our offices and facilities sustain-ably, with a strong focus on our data centers.
Tuesday, June 4, 2019
Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Thursday, May 23, 2019
How Far Does $100K Stretch In Boston? You'll Be Sorry You Asked | Patch
Patch: How Far Does $100K Stretch In Boston? You'll Be Sorry You Asked
Here's what the authors had to say:
"Massachusetts has a reputation as a high-tax state, but a whole host of high costs lands Boston in the bottom 10 when it comes to take-home pay on a $100,000 salary. City residents suffer from high rent and grocery costs as well, along with the second-highest healthcare expenses of any city.
- Federal income taxes: $17,262.50
- Net pay after income taxes: $74,197.70
- Annual rent: $32,496
- Annual groceries: $5,245
- Annual utilities: $1,874.64
- Annual driving costs: $8,037
- Annual healthcare: $9,234
- Income leftover: $17,311
Thursday, May 16, 2019
Scott Sumner: The Myth of Stagnant US Wages: Fed Data Show the Story Was All Wrong
After the 2016 election, several pundits suggested that the Trump victory reflected frustration with stagnant real wages. Unfortunately, this argument is based on a misconception. The average hourly earnings series at the FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) data site only goes back 12 years, but real wages were doing well before the 2016 election:
By the way, in nominal terms, average hourly earnings are currently $27.77/hour. FRED does have a much longer series for average wages earned by production and nonsupervisory employees (which currently stands at $23.31):
I could not find median hourly wages, but they did have data on median weekly wages (currently $905):
There was a period of stagnant real wages, but it ended in the mid-1990s. All of these series show significant growth in real wages since the mid-1990s. Whatever explains the rise of populism in America, it is not stagnant wages. By the way, these time series understate the growth in total labor compensation, as the cost of fringe benefits such as health care has risen faster than nominal wage growth.
Alternatively, if you believe that health benefits are nearly worthless (my view), then the nominal wage series should be deflated by a price index that excludes health care. That would show even more rapid growth in real wages.
PS. There is one downside to writing a post and then delaying the publication. Today’s Bloomberg has an article that makes many of the same points, and in some cases more effectively. But it doesn’t have my graphs.
Scott B. Sumner is the director of the Program on Monetary Policy at the Mercatus Center and a professor at Bentley University. He blogs at the Money Illusion and Econlog.
By the way, in nominal terms, average hourly earnings are currently $27.77/hour. FRED does have a much longer series for average wages earned by production and nonsupervisory employees (which currently stands at $23.31):
I could not find median hourly wages, but they did have data on median weekly wages (currently $905):
There was a period of stagnant real wages, but it ended in the mid-1990s. All of these series show significant growth in real wages since the mid-1990s. Whatever explains the rise of populism in America, it is not stagnant wages. By the way, these time series understate the growth in total labor compensation, as the cost of fringe benefits such as health care has risen faster than nominal wage growth.
Alternatively, if you believe that health benefits are nearly worthless (my view), then the nominal wage series should be deflated by a price index that excludes health care. That would show even more rapid growth in real wages.
PS. There is one downside to writing a post and then delaying the publication. Today’s Bloomberg has an article that makes many of the same points, and in some cases more effectively. But it doesn’t have my graphs.
Scott Sumner
This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.
Friday, May 3, 2019
Note on the April 2019 U.S. Employment Situation: U-Rate 3.6%; Jobs +263,000
OVERVIEW
ANALYSIS
This month’s report is a rebounding blockbuster, considering two months ago the U.S. stock market and policy makers were stunned by the creation of only 56,000 jobs. (The original number was 33,000).
Wall Street estimated the April payrolls number at 185,000 jobs. Earlier in the week, the ADP National Employment Report, estimated the creation of 275,000 new private sector jobs; the BLS reported private sector job creation at 236,000 jobs.
Retail trade changed little in April; the sector was down 12,000 jobs but the motor vehicle and parts dealers subsector added 8,000 jobs. General merchandise stores suffered a loss of 9,000 jobs.
Revisions to previous reports were mixed. The February payrolls number was revised upward to 56,000 from 33,000 and the March number was revised down from 196,000 to 189,000. Still the revisions identified 16,000 more jobs than previously reported. The three-month moving average settled at 169,000 per month. Similar revisions from the earlier three months resulted in a three-month average of 180,000.
The unemployment rate of 3.6 percent is the lowest since 1969.
The current economy, based on supply-side reforms, is benefiting workers and instilling confidence in consumers. Not so long ago, market watchers were worried about the slowdown in consumer spending as a bellwether of an almost certain downturn.
On Thursday, the BLS reported than nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 3.6 percent in the first quarter of 2019, with output increasing by 4.1 percent and hours worked increased 0.5 percent. Along with productivity (another blow-out number), the job market is at a sweet spot.
Today’s report noted that average hourly earnings over the past year have increased by 3.2 percent. Workers and consumers are more careful about how they treat homeowner equity which is 16 percent higher than 2006, the advent of the Great Recession. Apparently increased wages serve as a bulwark against reckless home equity borrowing.
As a result, workers are saving more. The article to read is “Why Are Americans Suddenly Saving?” by Matthew C. Klein in Barron’s on April 22, 2019.
Source: Author’s calculations based on BLS and US Census historical data (Total Retail Sales)
Conte Consulting: Editorial Services | Web Content Design & Management |Public Policy Analysis
- Total non-farm payroll employment increased by 263,000 and the unemployment rate declined to 3.6 percent, moving down 0.2 percentage point from the previous month according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- The Labor Force Participation (LFP) rate declined by 0.2 percentage point to 62.8 percent. Nonetheless, the rate was unchanged from a year ago. The Employment-Population ratio also remained at 60.6 percent. Since October 2018, the rate has been either 60.6 percent or 60.7 percent.
- Professional and Business Services (+76,000) and Construction (+33,000) led all sectors in the April payrolls. Employment in Health Care (+27,000) did not finish in the top two sectors for growth but along with Professional Services (+535,000) added the most jobs over the past year with Health Care adding +404,000 jobs.
- With gains in nonresidential specialty trade contractors and in heavy and civil engineering, Construction has added 33,000 jobs. For the year, the sector has added 22,000 jobs.
- Manufacturing sector employment (+4,000) changed little for the third month in a row. In the 12 months prior to February 2019 the industry added on average 22,000 jobs per month.
- Average hourly earnings rose by 6 cents to $27.77. In April, average workweek for all employees decreased by 0.1 hour to 34.4 hours matching the rate for February 2019.
- The number of persons employed part-time held was unchanged at 4.7 million in April. The number of long-termed unemployed (greater than 27 weeks) remained unchanged at 1.2 million and remained to account for 21.1 percent of all unemployed.
- The following sectors saw little or no change in employment: Mining, Wholesale Trade, Transportation and Warehousing, Information, Leisure and Hospitality, and Government.
ANALYSIS
This month’s report is a rebounding blockbuster, considering two months ago the U.S. stock market and policy makers were stunned by the creation of only 56,000 jobs. (The original number was 33,000).
Wall Street estimated the April payrolls number at 185,000 jobs. Earlier in the week, the ADP National Employment Report, estimated the creation of 275,000 new private sector jobs; the BLS reported private sector job creation at 236,000 jobs.
Retail trade changed little in April; the sector was down 12,000 jobs but the motor vehicle and parts dealers subsector added 8,000 jobs. General merchandise stores suffered a loss of 9,000 jobs.
Revisions to previous reports were mixed. The February payrolls number was revised upward to 56,000 from 33,000 and the March number was revised down from 196,000 to 189,000. Still the revisions identified 16,000 more jobs than previously reported. The three-month moving average settled at 169,000 per month. Similar revisions from the earlier three months resulted in a three-month average of 180,000.
The unemployment rate of 3.6 percent is the lowest since 1969.
The current economy, based on supply-side reforms, is benefiting workers and instilling confidence in consumers. Not so long ago, market watchers were worried about the slowdown in consumer spending as a bellwether of an almost certain downturn.
On Thursday, the BLS reported than nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased 3.6 percent in the first quarter of 2019, with output increasing by 4.1 percent and hours worked increased 0.5 percent. Along with productivity (another blow-out number), the job market is at a sweet spot.
Today’s report noted that average hourly earnings over the past year have increased by 3.2 percent. Workers and consumers are more careful about how they treat homeowner equity which is 16 percent higher than 2006, the advent of the Great Recession. Apparently increased wages serve as a bulwark against reckless home equity borrowing.
As a result, workers are saving more. The article to read is “Why Are Americans Suddenly Saving?” by Matthew C. Klein in Barron’s on April 22, 2019.
Source: Author’s calculations based on BLS and US Census historical data (Total Retail Sales)
Conte Consulting: Editorial Services | Web Content Design & Management |Public Policy Analysis
Wednesday, April 24, 2019
Monday, April 15, 2019
Friday, April 12, 2019
Thursday, April 11, 2019
Friday, April 5, 2019
Notes on the March 2019 U.S. Employment Situation: U-Rate: 3.8%; Jobs: +196,000
OVERVIEW
ANALYSIS
- Total non-farm payroll employment increased by 196,000 and the unemployment rate remained 3.8 percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- The Labor Force Participation (LFP) rate was little changed at 63.0 percent. This gauge of employment has hardly moved over the past year. The Employment-Population ratio also remained at 60.6 percent.
- Health Care (+49,000) and Professional and Business Services (+34,000) led all sectors in the March payrolls. Both sectors led job creation over the past twelve months with 398,000 and 311,000 jobs, respectively.
- According to the BLS, the following sectors saw little or no change in employment: Mining, Wholesale Trade, Retail Trade, Transportation and warehousing, Information, Financial Activities and Government.
- After adding 1,000 jobs in February, the Manufacturing sector lost 6,000 jobs, almost all of those jobs in motor vehicles and parts.
- Average hourly earnings rose by 4 cents to $27.70. In March, average workweek for all employees rose by 0.1 to 34.5 hours after seeing a decline in February by 0.1 hour.
- Employment continued to trend up in Food services and drinking places in March (+27,000), in line with its average monthly growth over the prior 12 months said BLS.
- The number of persons employed part-time held steady at 4.5 million in March.
- The number of long-termed unemployed (greater than 27 weeks) remained unchanged at 1.3 million. This group represents 21.1 percent of all unemployed.
ANALYSIS
Anyone looking for a stronger revision to the February employment situation report of 20,000 jobs will be disappointed by the final print for the month: 33,000. That new number was the weakest since September 2017.
Even January was revised upward only slightly from the February-revised 311,000 to 312,000.
The BLS said the revisions resulted in a three-month average of 180,000 (down for the same period for the first quarter of 2018).
Still today’s number, a positive snap-back, encouraged some optimism. The headline of 196,000 new jobs did top Wall Street expectations of 180,000 for the month. Marvin Loh, global macro strategist at State Street, told Yahoo News that the March jobs report will be “the first clean one in a while” now the fallout from the government shutdown is mostly over.
The widely-read ADP payroll processing firm survey earlier this week reported a gain of 129,000 private sector jobs, the BLS contrasted with 182,000 jobs.
The question remains the cohort that is still sidelined from the job growth of the past decade. The BLS reports that 95.5 million were out of the labor force compared to 95.4 last March The employment-population ratio was 60.6 percent in March; the BLS noted that this ratio has been either 60.6 or 60.7 percent since October 2018.
Two closely-watched indicators, persons marginally attached to the labor force and discouraged workers have changed little over the past year.
This report also showed ongoing upside. The unemployment status by educational attainment showed declines among the four major groups. The unemployment rate for workers with a high school diploma but no college declined from 4.7 in March 2018 to 3.7 in March 2019. Those with the bachelor’s degree or more continue to see lower unemployment at 2.0 percent.
The American jobs machine continues to grow over a longer-term horizon. Since January 2007, months before the Great Recession, the American economy has added 12.9 million jobs with the construction, manufacturing and information sectors the only losers over this period. (See chart.)
Source: Author’s calculations based on BLS historical data |
Conte Consulting:
Editorial Services |Web Content Design & Management|Public Policy AnalysisWednesday, April 3, 2019
State House News Service: Median home sale prices vary widely across Massachusetts
From Michael Norton at SHNS:
At $365,000, the year-to-date median home sale price in Massachusetts is up 4.9 percent over last year and raising eyebrows among buyers, sellers and those left on the outside of the market activity.
But data released Wednesday shows sellers are getting far higher prices in many areas while buyers have been able to purchase homes for much less in others, largely based around proximity to the Greater Boston area.
According to the Warren Group, year-to-date median home sale prices fell under the $365,000 statewide median in seven of the state’s 14 counties.
The lowest year-to-date median home sale price was in Berkshire County ($182,500, -2.9 percent), followed by Hampden County ($187,000, +5.7 percent), Franklin County ($210,000, +11.4 percent), Hampshire County ($255,000, +3.7 percent), Worcester County ($260,000, +3.1 percent), Bristol County ($289,000, +5.1 percent), and Plymouth County ($363,406, +8.3 percent).
Wednesday, March 27, 2019
Wednesday, March 20, 2019
Monday, February 25, 2019
New NBER Working Paper: "Work of the Past, Work of the Future" by David Autor
From a new NBER Working Paper, "work of the Past, Work of the Future," by David Autor
Abstract:
Labor markets in U.S. cities today are vastly more educated and skill-intensive than they were five decades ago. Yet, urban non-college workers perform substantially less skilled work than decades earlier. This deskilling reflects the joint effects of automation and international trade, which have eliminated the bulk of non-college production, administrative support, and clerical jobs, yielding a disproportionate polarization of urban labor markets. The unwinding of the urban non-college occupational skill gradient has, I argue, abetted a secular fall in real non-college wages by: (1) shunting non-college workers out of specialized middle-skill occupations into low-wage occupations that require only generic skills; (2) diminishing the set of non-college workers that hold middle-skill jobs in high-wage cities; and (3) attenuating, to a startling degree, the steep urban wage premium for non-college workers that prevailed in earlier decades. Changes in the nature of work—many! of which are technological in origin—have been more disruptive and less beneficial for non-college than college workers.
Gated copy here.
Thursday, February 21, 2019
Wednesday, February 20, 2019
Thursday, February 14, 2019
Wednesday, February 13, 2019
Wednesday, February 6, 2019
Statista: Chart: Where Labor Productivity Is Highest | Statista
You will find more infographics at Statista
Friday, February 1, 2019
US EMPSIT: January 2019: U-Rate: 4.0%; Jobs: +304,000
OVERVIEW
- The unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.0 percent in January with payrolls expanding by 304,000 jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- The Labor Force Participation (LFP) rate changed little at 63.2 percent. The Employment-Population ratio also remained at 60.7 percent. Both measures are up 0.5 percentage points over the year.
- Job gains took place in Leisure and Hospitality (+74,000) and Construction (+52,000) Health Care (+42,000) and Transportation and Warehousing (+27,000) In addition, Professional and Business Services added 30,000 jobs.
- According to the BLS, the following sectors saw little or no change in employment: Wholesale Trade, Information and Financial Activities.
- Over the year, average hourly earnings have increased by 85 cents or 3.2 percent. In January, the average hourly private nonfarm wage rang in at $27.56. The average workweek for all employees was unchanged at 34.5 hours.
- The number of persons employed part-time increased to 5.1 million in January, most of it coming from the private sector and due to the shutdown.
- The number of long-termed unemployed (greater than 27 weeks) remained unchanged at 1.3 million.
ANALYSIS
If anyone was looking for the federal government shutdown to pause the American jobs machine, they will have to look elsewhere. The economy entered its 100th straight month of increased employment.
According to the latest measurement, the shutdown had minimal impact on job creation with the payrolls number arriving at 304,000.
Wall Street economists expected a January print of approximately 170,000 jobs.
On Wednesday, ADP, the payroll processing company, reported an increase of 213,000 private sector jobs in January. Today, the BLS reported the economy created 296,000 private sector jobs. Both measures generally track together (See chart above).
According to the BLS, federal government employment was unchanged in January. The agency explained: “Federal employees on furlough during the partial government shutdown were counted as employed in the establishment survey because they worked or received pay (or will receive pay) for the pay period that included the 12th of the month.”
Revisions to the two previous months resulted in a decline of 70,000 jobs. The November 2018 number was revised up from +176,000 to +196,000. However, the December number was revised downward from +312,000 to +222,000.
The decline is explained by the BLS adjustment of its annual benchmarking process. Accounting for these revisions, the three-month average rang in at 241,000 per month.
Conte Consulting: Editorial Services | Web Content Design & Management |Public Policy Analysis
Sunday, January 27, 2019
Saturday, January 26, 2019
Friday, January 25, 2019
Statista: Ocasio-Cortez's Tax Plan Isn't Unprecedented | Statista
You will find more infographics at Statista
Chart: Ocasio-Cortez's Tax Plan Isn't Unprecedented | Statista
Wednesday, January 23, 2019
Monday, January 21, 2019
Friday, January 18, 2019
Friday, January 11, 2019
Wednesday, January 9, 2019
Sunday, January 6, 2019
How the Job Market of 2018 Stacks Up: Real Time Economics - Wall Street Journal
WSJ:
Wages rose 3.2%, both hourly and weekly. That's not quite as strong as some of the year-over-year readings earlier this year, but it's the best number to close the year in over a decade.
Wednesday, January 2, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
From two graduates of the Suffolk University PhD program in Economics I had the pleasure of knowing and working with over the years. Here...
-
Stock market woes raise a nagging fear: Is a recession near?
-
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.50.3.781 Mirrless Review by Mart
Indicators
Test