Saturday, September 30, 2017
Wednesday, September 27, 2017
More money for Massachusetts transportation won't solve problems
The Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation this week released a new report on the state's transportation system. Key take-away:
“What is clear is that the state lacks the requisite information to make profoundly difficult choices,” the report writes. “Questions such as which projects to fund and when, and how revenue sources should be allocated must be included as part of a long-term sustainable transportation finance plan to address our transportation needs. Unfortunately, the state has not yet adopted such a plan.”MassLive.com has a good summary of the report.
Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren: Trends point to higher inflation
From the Boston Fed:
Speaking in New York, Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren said that underlying trends suggest "an economy that risks pushing past what is sustainable, raising the probability of higher asset prices, or inflation well above the Federal Reserve's 2 percent target."
"Steps lowering the probability of such an outcome seem advisable – in other words, seem like insurance worth taking out at this time," he said. "As a result, it is my view that regular and gradual removal of monetary accommodation seems appropriate."
Noting that the weakness in inflation readings appears to be transitory, Rosengren said "the declines in the unemployment rate below the level most see as sustainable seem likely to be more long-lasting."
"Discerning the underlying trends in unemployment and inflation – looking through transitory effects – is likely to be quite difficult in coming months," Rosengren said, citing the impact of recent hurricanes on economic data.
In addition, Rosengren noted that the Federal Reserve's dual mandate indicators – employment and inflation – are sending somewhat conflicting signals of late: labor markets have continued to improve, yet inflation has slipped down a notch this year.
Asking how policymakers might resolve the conflicting signals when "the central bank's dual mandate is 'dueling,'" Rosengren explored the forecasts of both central bankers and private forecasters. Both suggest that by the end of next year, inflation is expected to be close to target, while the unemployment rate will continue to fall – and as a result, will move further below most estimates of a sustainable unemployment rate.
Read more: Trends and Transitory Shocks - Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Speaking in New York, Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren said that underlying trends suggest "an economy that risks pushing past what is sustainable, raising the probability of higher asset prices, or inflation well above the Federal Reserve's 2 percent target."
"Steps lowering the probability of such an outcome seem advisable – in other words, seem like insurance worth taking out at this time," he said. "As a result, it is my view that regular and gradual removal of monetary accommodation seems appropriate."
Noting that the weakness in inflation readings appears to be transitory, Rosengren said "the declines in the unemployment rate below the level most see as sustainable seem likely to be more long-lasting."
"Discerning the underlying trends in unemployment and inflation – looking through transitory effects – is likely to be quite difficult in coming months," Rosengren said, citing the impact of recent hurricanes on economic data.
In addition, Rosengren noted that the Federal Reserve's dual mandate indicators – employment and inflation – are sending somewhat conflicting signals of late: labor markets have continued to improve, yet inflation has slipped down a notch this year.
Asking how policymakers might resolve the conflicting signals when "the central bank's dual mandate is 'dueling,'" Rosengren explored the forecasts of both central bankers and private forecasters. Both suggest that by the end of next year, inflation is expected to be close to target, while the unemployment rate will continue to fall – and as a result, will move further below most estimates of a sustainable unemployment rate.
Read more: Trends and Transitory Shocks - Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
35. Tarnishing the Golden and Empire States: Land-Use Restrictions and the U.S. Economic Slowdown by Kyle F. Herkenhoff, Lee E. Ohanian, Edward C. Prescott - #23790 (EFG) Abstract: This paper studies the impact of state-level land-use restrictions on U.S. economic activity, focusing on how these restrictions have depressed macroeconomic activity since 2000. We use a variety of state-level data sources, together with a general equilibrium spatial model of the United States to systematically construct a panel dataset of state-level land-use restrictions between 1950 and 2014. We show that these restrictions have generally tightened over time, particularly in California and New York. We use the model to analyze how these restrictions affect economic activity and the allocation of workers and capital across states. Counterfactual experiments show that deregulating existing urban land from 2014 regulation levels back to 1980 levels would have increased US GDP and productivity roughly to their current trend levels. California, New York, and the Mid-Atlantic region expand the most in these counterfactuals, drawing population out of the South and the Rustbelt. General equilibrium effects, particularly the reallocation of capital across states, accounts for much of these gains. http://papers.nber.org/papers/w23790?utm_campaign=ntw&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ntw
Structural Transformation, Deep Downturns, and Government Policy
Joseph E. Stiglitz
Most recessions are a result of some shock to the economic system,
typically amplified by financial accelerators, and leading to large
balance sheet effects of households and firms, which result in the
effects persisting. But, over time, the balance sheets get restored.
Even banks recover.
But
episodically, the “shock” is deeper. It is structural. Among advanced
countries, the movement from agricultural to manufacturing in the last
century, and the more recent movement from manufacturing to the service
sector reflect such a large economic transformation. The associated
downturns are longer lasting. The usual responses, in particular,
monetary policy, are only of limited efficacy. Policies have to be
designed to facilitate such transformations: markets on their own
typically do not do well.
This
paper explains why such transformations are associated with
persistently high unemployment, and describes the effects of particular
government policies. It looks at the lessons of the Great Depression
both for the advanced countries and the developing countries as they go
through their structural transformations.
You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format
from SSRN.com ($5) for electronic delivery.
Tuesday, September 5, 2017
Which sectors provided the most job growth since January 2007: A 10-year look
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, CES Series |
Last Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the U.S. economy created 156,000 jobs in August 2017, a number below economists' consensus estimates. The unemployment rate "was little unchanged" according to the BLS, but actually ticked upward to 4.4 percent. Major job gains emerged in manufacturing, construction, professional and technical services, health care and mining. How have these sectors fared since the peak before the Great Recession, which began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009? How does Friday's snapshot relate to longer term trends?
The decline in manufacturing jobs in the United States has trended downward over the decades. Few workers are producing more output. The interesting takeaway from this chart is the decline in construction jobs. Despite the uptick in the economy, construction jobs are down 800,000 since January 2007. The high-paying education and health services and professional the business services added more than two-thirds of the decade long gain to total non-farm employment. Less impressive is the gain in the generally lower paid professions of leisure and hospitality which added 2.6 million since January 2007.
When pot laws are not the same across states, can we expect seepage?
In their new working paper, Benjamin Hansen, Keaton Miller, Caroline Weber ask "How Extensive is Inter-State Diversion of Recreational Marijuana?" Only a small amount they say.
Abstract:
Despite federal prohibition, recreational marijuana is available to 21% of the United States population. A chief concern among policy makers across multiple levels of government and political parties is inter-state diversion of marijuana from states with legal markets to others. We measure this diversion with a natural experiment. Oregon opened a recreational market on October 1, 2015, next to an existing market in Washington, which opened on July 8, 2014. Using comprehensive administrative data on the universe of Washington sales, we find Washington retailers along the Oregon border experienced a 41% decline in sales immediately following Oregon's market opening. Retailers along Washington's borders with Idaho and Canada experienced no such decline. The decline occurred equally across weekdays and weekends, and was largest among the largest transaction sizes, suggesting diversion, not drug tourism, was to blame. Our estimates suggest that 11.9% of the marijuana sold in Washington was diverted out of the state before Oregon legalized and
7.5% remains diverted today.
A gated copy of the research paper can be found here.
Abstract:
Despite federal prohibition, recreational marijuana is available to 21% of the United States population. A chief concern among policy makers across multiple levels of government and political parties is inter-state diversion of marijuana from states with legal markets to others. We measure this diversion with a natural experiment. Oregon opened a recreational market on October 1, 2015, next to an existing market in Washington, which opened on July 8, 2014. Using comprehensive administrative data on the universe of Washington sales, we find Washington retailers along the Oregon border experienced a 41% decline in sales immediately following Oregon's market opening. Retailers along Washington's borders with Idaho and Canada experienced no such decline. The decline occurred equally across weekdays and weekends, and was largest among the largest transaction sizes, suggesting diversion, not drug tourism, was to blame. Our estimates suggest that 11.9% of the marijuana sold in Washington was diverted out of the state before Oregon legalized and
7.5% remains diverted today.
A gated copy of the research paper can be found here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
From two graduates of the Suffolk University PhD program in Economics I had the pleasure of knowing and working with over the years. Here...
-
Stock market woes raise a nagging fear: Is a recession near?
-
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.50.3.781 Mirrless Review by Mart
Indicators
Test