St. Louis Fed: "Warning: Don’t Infer Regional Inflation Differences from House Price Changes"

"There are a few reasons why regional house price growth does not measure regional inflation and thus does not accurately reflect changes in the cost of living. First, house prices capture both the price of housing services (i.e., shelter) and the value of housing as an asset (which is primarily the price of the land). The latter drives most of the change in house prices. As the value of housing increases (decreases), the return on investment for homeowners increases (decreases), driving up (down) the price that consumers will pay for housing. Changes in house prices are useful for studying broad housing market trends, as well as household wealth, but do not necessarily reflect changes in the actual cost of housing services for homeowners. "

From a new article by Charles S. Gascon and Andrew Spewak in Economic Synopses, a publication of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

The Evolution of U.S. Monetary Policy

A very readable overview of monetary policy in the United States by Robert L. Hetzel, a staff economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.

Abstract: 

Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve System in 1913, policymakers have always pursued the goal of economic stability. At the same time, their understanding of the world and of the role of monetary policy has changed dramatically. This evolution of views provides a laboratory for understanding what kinds of monetary policy stabilize the economy and what kinds destabilize it.

Available here.

Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren: Trends point to higher inflation

From the Boston Fed:

Speaking in New York, Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren said that underlying trends suggest "an economy that risks pushing past what is sustainable, raising the probability of higher asset prices, or inflation well above the Federal Reserve's 2 percent target."

"Steps lowering the probability of such an outcome seem advisable – in other words, seem like insurance worth taking out at this time," he said. "As a result, it is my view that regular and gradual removal of monetary accommodation seems appropriate."

Noting that the weakness in inflation readings appears to be transitory, Rosengren said "the declines in the unemployment rate below the level most see as sustainable seem likely to be more long-lasting."

"Discerning the underlying trends in unemployment and inflation – looking through transitory effects – is likely to be quite difficult in coming months," Rosengren said, citing the impact of recent hurricanes on economic data.

In addition, Rosengren noted that the Federal Reserve's dual mandate indicators – employment and inflation – are sending somewhat conflicting signals of late: labor markets have continued to improve, yet inflation has slipped down a notch this year.

Asking how policymakers might resolve the conflicting signals when "the central bank's dual mandate is 'dueling,'" Rosengren explored the forecasts of both central bankers and private forecasters. Both suggest that by the end of next year, inflation is expected to be close to target, while the unemployment rate will continue to fall – and as a result, will move further below most estimates of a sustainable unemployment rate.



Read more: Trends and Transitory Shocks - Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

For the past decade, Americans have been paying less for gasoline in real terms